News & Blog
Legal perspectives from our expert lawyers
Legal perspectives from our expert lawyers
The Claimant in Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v Mangogna [2023] NSWPICMP 509 alleged that they had sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident on 8 January 2021.
On 24 February 2022, Richard Crookes Constructions Pty Ltd (RCC) subcontracted with Prestige Form Group NSW Pty Ltd (Prestige) to carry out formwork in connection with a construction. The formwork failed as concrete was poured into it by another of R...
On 18 October 2023 the NSW Personal Injury Commission released its decision in Alzate v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA [2023] NSWPICMR 51. The Claimant in this matter was unemployed on the date of her motor accident and was receiving parenting...
On 3 October 2023, the NSW Supreme Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in the matter of Karaoglu v Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 229.
Pursuant to section 131 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act (NSW), a Claimant is only entitled to damages for non-economic loss where the permanent impairment is greater than 10% and results from an injury caused by a motor vehicle accident.
The decision in Aleksic v AAI Limited t/as GIO [2023] NSWPICMP 466 acts as a reminder that in threshold injury disputes, a motor accident does not need to be the sole cause – or even the predominant cause – of the relevant medical condition.
In New South Wales, the Civil Liability Act 2002 NSW (the Act) is the governing legislation that governs the recovery of damages for personal injury caused by the fault of a person. Part 1A of the Act outlines the rules pertaining to negligence, whic...
Case Note – Zaya v Damirdjian Judgment date: 11 October 2022 Citation: Zaya v Damirdjian [2022] NSWCA 203 Jurisdiction: Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of NSW Before: Bell CJ, Gleeson JA and Griffiths AJA Principles Expert evidence has a limited...
A claimant suffers psychological injury when he is threatened by a would be thief of his motor bike. Whether the medical assessor was justified in concluding that this was not a motor accident was answered by the Supreme Court in Bell v Allianz Insur...
