The Proper Lookout Podcast

Welcome to the The Proper Lookout Podcast published by the Statutory Insurance Group of McCabes.

the proper lookout podcast

In this series, our CTP experts discuss a range of topics – sharing their thoughts on an industry trend or intriguing legal issue, explaining the intricacies of an important case, and hopefully imparting some of the knowledge they have gained.

#143 – Getting under my skin – Abawi v Allianz

In Abawi v Allianz, the Medical Review Panel looked at whether a laceration to the skin fell within the definition of a “threshold injury” in s 1.6 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017.

Principal Peter Hunt reviews the decision and adds his own commentary on the issue.

Relevant Case Law & Legislation


#142 – Exploring Traumatic Brain Injury

In this episode of The Proper Lookout Podcast, Principal Peter Hunt discusses the traumatic brain injury with friend of the podcast, Professor Associate Joseph Suttie.


#141 – Does Surgery Render A Below-Threshold Injury Above-Threshold?

In Mandoukos v Allianz, the Supreme Court considered whether a cervical surgery could transform a below-threshold injury into an above-threshold injury. In this episode of The Proper Lookout Podcast, Principal Peter Hunt discusses the scope of the decision and the implications.

Relevant Case Law and Legislation


#140 – More Threshold Injury Questions: Is Radiculopathy Always Necessary?

In this episode, Principal Peter Hunt discusses the decision in Mohmand v Allianz, where the Supreme Court looked at whether a Claimant always needs to exhibit radiculopathy to demonstrate that their cervical spine injury is an above-threshold injury for the purpose of s 1.6 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017.

Relevant Case Law and Legislation


#139 – Threshold Injury Review: Breast Implant Rupture

Are artificial members part of the body? And, if they are damaged, are they non-threshold injuries?

In this episode of The Proper Lookout Podcast, Principal Peter Hunt discusses what a PIC Review Panel thinks on these questions.

Relevant Case Law and Legislation


#138 – Threshold Injury Review: Injury to the Skin

Does injury to the skin, alone, entitle a Claimant to ongoing statutory benefits and common law damages?

In this episode of The Proper Lookout Podcast, Principal Peter Hunt reviews three PIC Review Panel decisions which consider whether injury to the skin falls within the statutory definition of a “threshold injury”.

Relevant Case Law and Legislation:


#137 – Art and Artificiality: The rise of ChatGPT

In this episode of The Proper Lookout Podcast, Principal Peter Hunt joins Associate Professor Joseph Suttie to explore the impact of artificial intelligence, like ChatGPT, in the workplace.
NOTE: no AI was deployed in recording of this podcast episode. All thoughts are those of the participants!


#136 – Combatting Burnout

All organisations, including insurers and law firms, are confronted with employees at the risk of burnout. In this episode of The Proper Lookout Podcast, Principal Peter Hunt discusses the issues with Associate Professor Joseph Suttie.


#135 – Page Limits – A View from the Bench

In this very special episode, Principal Peter Hunt talks to The Honourable Geoffrey Bellew SC, a former Justice of the Supreme Court of NSW, about the challenges of life on the Bench, including those which arise when the parties tender large volumes of irrelevant material.

The discussion is topical for CTP insurers and practitioners as the Personal Injury Commission contemplates the introduction of page limits.


#134 – Borderline Personality Disorders

Most claims managers have probably experienced Claimants who demonstrate obsessive personality traits in the context of the management of their claim.

In this episode of the Proper Lookout Podcast, Principal Peter Hunt discusses Borderline Personality Disorders with Associate Professor Joseph Suttie and how they might impact the claims experience.


#133 – Artificial Intelligence & Autonomous Vehicles

What happens if an autonomous vehicle thinks a tree blowing in the wind is a pedestrian about to run across the road? How might the autonomous vehicle behave when it perceives this “danger”? In this episode, Principal Peter Hunt interviews Associate Professor Joseph Suttie about the AI used in autonomous vehicles.


#132 – Amendment to PAWE provisions

The Motor Accident and Workers Compensation Amendment Act 2022 made some amendment to the calculation of weekly benefits under MAIA. In this episode, Julia Douglas-Oliveira and Raissa Galang discuss the changes.


#131 – Amendment to No-Fault provisions

In this episode, Raissa Galang and Julia Douglas-Oliveira discuss how the Motor Accident and Workers Compensation Amendment Act 2022 amended the “no-fault” provisions in Part 5 of MAIA.


#130 – FEDERAL JURISDICTION – Are the Commission’s power’s administrative or judicial?

The Personal Injury Commission can not be exercising the judicial power of the Commonwealth if it does not exercise judicial power at all. In this episode, Peter Hunt discusses recent Court decisions which discuss whether the PIC’s functions are administrative or judicial.


#129 – Amendments to Celebrate MAIA’s 5th Birthday

In this episode, Peter Hunt discusses the Motor Accident Injuries Amendment Bill 2022 which has passed both Houses of the NSW State Parliament.

Relevant case law and legislation


#128 – FEDERAL JURISDICTION – Interstate Claimants And NSW CTP Insurers

In this episode, In Stanton v Winning, the District Court clarified the vexing question of whether a dispute between an interstate claimant and a licenced NSW CTP insurer involves an exercise of federal jurisdiction within the meaning of Div 3.2 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2021Peter Hunt explains the decision and outlines the implications.

Relevant case law and legislation

 


#127 – Adjourning a PIC Assessment Conference

In this episode, Helen Huang and Katherine Teague discuss the ways available for parties to seek to vacate an Assessment Conference in the Personal Injury Commission, particularly during a Pandemic.

Relevant case law and legislation

 


#126 – FEDERAL JURISDICTION: State Residents against the State

In this episode of the Proper Lookout Podcast, Peter Hunt summarises his thinking on what types of CTP claims involve an exercise of federal jurisdiction.

Resources

 


#125 – FEDERAL JURISDICTION: Is the Nominal Defendant “the State”?

Pursuant to Part 3.2 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020, the Personal Injury Commission has no power to  exercise federal jurisdiction. In this episode, Peter Hunt discusses the District Court decision in Ritchie v The Nominal Defendant which examines whether a dispute between a resident of Queensland and the NSW Nominal Defendant involves an exercise of federal jurisdiction.

 


#124 – On the front foot; proactive WPI applications

In this episode, Helen Huang and Katherine Teague discuss the implications of the Claimant not seeking internal review of the Insurer’s permanent impairment determination and how to progress the matter without any further delays under the Motor Accidents Injuries Act.

 


#123 – What are the grounds for Mandatory and Discretionary Exemptions under MAIA?

In this episode, Rihab Abdul-Rahman and Tasnim Ali, discuss Mandatory and Discretionary Exemptions from the assessment of damages in the Personal Injury Commission.

Relevant case law and legislation:

 

  • Section 7.34(1)(a) of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017

Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 No 10 – NSW Legislation

  • Clause 14 of Motor Accidents Injuries Regulations

Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017 – NSW Legislation

  • Section 92 of Motor Accident and Compensation Act 1999

Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 – NSW Legislation


#122 – The PIC Stood Over List

In this episode, Helen Huang and Katherine Teague, discuss the implications of not lodging a damages dispute within the specified time limit and how to progress a damages claim to the Personal Injury Commission if it is not yet ready for assessment.

Relevant case law and legislation:


#121 – Read but not disclosed; denying parties procedural fairness

In this episode, Katherine Teague and Tasnim Ali kickstart their first mini-series “Are you being afforded Procedural Fairness?” by discussing how decision-makers may fail to afford procedural fairness when the fail to disclose to the parties material they have relied upon in reaching their decisions.

Relevant case law and legislation:


#120 – After the Common Law claim resolves; liability for treatment and care

In this episode, Helen Huan and Rihab Abdul-Rahman, discuss the impact of section 3.35 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 and section 151A(5) of Workers Compensation Act 1987 on liability in respect to ongoing treatment and care after a claim for common law damages has resolved.

Relevant case law and legislation:


#119 – You’ve resolved the claim! Let the Personal Injury Commission know.

In this episode, Katherine Teague and Tasnim Ali discuss the different ways available to alert the Personal Injury Commission that a claim has resolved, when a Claimant is represented and unrepresented.

Relevant case law and legislation:

  • Rule 71 of the Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021

118 – Amendments Proposed to MAIA No-Fault Provisions

The NSW State Government has introduced a Bill to amend aspects of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (and the Workers Compensation legislation). In this episode, Peter Hunt discusses how the Bill addresses the criticism of Part 5 of MAIA levelled in AAI v Singh.

Relevant case law and legislation


#117 – The true power of S85B MACA and S6.26 MAIA and ensuring they are effectively utilised

In this episode, Renée Reddy and special guest, Marco Nesbeth, of Counsel, discuss their recent Supreme Court administrative review case. They discuss the outcome and the precedent this case sets with respect to statutory non-compliance and the true power of S85B and S6.26 Notices (and other similar provisions) within the MACA and MAIA framework.


To access our earlier episodes, click here.