Foez Dewan
Principal
In Australia, companies can be deregistered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) for a range of reasons, including:
Upon deregistration a company loses its legal personality and ceases to exist. All of the company’s property held immediately before deregistration, including any which had vested in a liquidator but save for property held on trust, vests in ASIC pursuant to s 601AD(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Any property held on trust vests in the Commonwealth pursuant to s 601AD(1A). Other statutory effects of the deregistration of a company are also set out in that section.
As a result, it is necessary to reinstate a deregistered company when there are unresolved legal matters or claims against the company. Examples of these scenarios include when an individual or entity seeks to bring legal action against the deregistered company, or to take derivative action against third parties (e.g. directors or other officers) on behalf of that company.
The Federal Court decision of Justice Jackman in Chu v Lin, in the matter of Gold Stone Capital Pty Ltd (Trial Judgment) [2024] FCA 766 concerned the company Gold Stone Capital Pty Ltd which was deregistered on 13 May 2020; however, on application by the plaintiffs, the company was reinstated by orders made by Rares J on 5 August 2022.
The reinstatement of a deregistered company is governed by s 601AH of the Act. Subsections 601AH(1), (1A) and (1B) allow for ASIC itself to reinstate the registration of a company on its own initiative or on application in certain circumstance, for example in cases where a company had been subject of an ASIC-initiated deregistration under s 601AB.
Subsection 601AH(2) provides for Court ordered reinstatement of the registration of a company on application subject to certain considerations.
A court can reinstate a deregistered company on application by a ‘person aggrieved’ by the deregistration or a former liquidator.
The term ‘person aggrieved’ refers to a class of persons which the Courts have construed liberally – an applicant need only demonstrate to a Court that the applicant has suffered or may suffer some detriment or potential detriment. The Court will assess a claimed detriment but only to the threshold that it is not plainly hopeless and bound to fail; a Court will not conduct an in-depth analysis into the facts and law underlying the claim.
The requirement will generally be satisfied where the applicant has any proprietary or pecuniary interest that has been affected by the deregistration or the applicant has been injured or damaged in a legal sense, as a result of the company’s deregistration. However, mere dissatisfaction with the deregistration is not sufficient.
The plaintiffs, in their application for the reinstatement of the registration of Gold Stone, relied on principles laid out by Gleeson J in Re LCW Property Holdings Pty Ltd (deregistered) [2020] NSWSC 71 at [21] where his Honour found that the right to make claims against a company, which were lost on its deregistration constituted relevant detriment. The plaintiffs also relied on the statements of Bell P in Owners of SP 91349 v ASIC [2020] NSWSC 685; 147 ACSR 456 at [65], [90]-[96] as to the relevant threshold.
Time limits apply to applications for the reinstatement of a deregistered company – an application for reinstatement must be made within 15 years after deregistration.
Courts have broad discretion in making reinstatement orders and evaluates several factors including but not limited to:
It is important to note that the mere fact that a company was actively conducting business at the time of deregistration does not automatically justify its reinstatement. Conversely, the company’s insolvency at the time of deregistration does not, by itself, preclude reinstatement, provided the company is deemed potentially viable.
However, reinstating an insolvent company for the purpose of continuing business operations is generally deemed inappropriate. Despite this, an insolvent company may still be reinstated if the intention is to wind it up again or to address new liabilities.
Upon reinstatement, the company is considered to have continued in existence as if it had never been deregistered. This means:
However, parties should note that acts purportedly carried out or decisions purportedly made by the company during its period of deregistration is not automatically validated or ratified. A court has the ability to validate such acts pursuant to s 601AH(3)(c), however an application must be made to the court to do so.
This is a crucial step in affording stakeholders such as creditors and members the opportunity to commence legal proceedings against a deregistered company or taking steps, such as derivative action, on behalf of a deregistered company.
McCabes has extensive experience in matters involving the reinstatement of registration of companies and directors and officeholders of those companies including for any alleged breach of their duties in derivative action. Please do not hesitate to contact McCabes if you may have claims which may only be pursued following reinstatement of the registration of a company.