News & Blog

Legal perspectives from our expert lawyers

Latest insights

Clear filters
Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Tenuous Trusts

The High Court has recently clarified what is required for the creation of an express trust (Korda & Ors v Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd [2015] HCA 6 (Korda)). To be effective, express trusts must satisfy the th...

Published by Andrew Lacey
14 April, 2015
Intellectual Property and Technology

Eavesdropping – can private conversations be recorded?

If someone records a telephone conversation without the express or implied consent of the parties to that conversation, it is highly likely that, by doing so, that person has committed an offence. Two legislative instruments regulate the recording o...

Published by Andrew Lacey
19 March, 2015
Litigation and Dispute Resolution

No High Court sympathy for pranksters

Readers would recall the Today FM controversy in which two radio presenters phoned the London hospital at which the Duchess of Cambridge was due to give birth, impersonating Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Charles, and enquired about...

Published by Andrew Lacey
16 March, 2015
Insolvency

Arbitrate or Adjudicate – do you still get a choice?

Are parties who agree to arbitration clauses ultimately relinquishing their right to resolve disputes pursuant to the jurisdiction of the court? Contracting parties are increasingly including 'arbitration clauses' in contracts. These clauses allow p...

Published by Andrew Lacey
10 March, 2015
Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Equitable estoppel – aiding victims of broken non-contractual promises

In an ideal world persons would protect themselves by not investing time and/or money in a project without a contract having been drawn up and executed. However the reality is that persons do often invest time and/or money without a contract, particu...

Published by Andrew Lacey
10 March, 2015
Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Federal Court intervention and non-compliance with accepted offers to compromise

The Federal Court Rules 2011 allow an offeree to apply to the Court for an order giving effect to an accepted offer to compromise in the event an offeror fails to comply with the terms of that offer (rule 25.10(a)). Non-compliance with an a...

Published by Andrew Lacey
8 March, 2015
SIGN UP FOR INSIGHTS

Get the latest news direct to your inbox

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
e.g. legal insights, firm news, divisional updates, etc
Marketing