Legal perspectives from our expert lawyers
It is an enticing thought for a day’s work to consist of answering a few work emails between dips in the pool and the next banana daiquiri. But, if you slip on the banana peel whilst walking from your computer to the pool, do you have a valid w...
McCabes acted on behalf of Allianz in successfully defending the proceedings brought by the Insured for alleged breach of contract and alleged damages of almost $1.6 million. Allianz had elected to undertake repair of damage caused by the insured eve...
It is well known that a company served with a statutory demand has 21 days to comply. If the recipient fails to pay the amount of the demand (or obtain a court order extending the period for compliance) within the period of 21 days after the demand i...
On 19 June 2019, the much-anticipated High Court appeal in the matter of Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth [2019] HCA 20 (also known as the "Amerind appeal") was handed down. The decision resolves ...
Insolvency – every director’s biggest nightmare. Under the Corporations Act s 459C, when a creditor serves a statutory demand on a company for an outstanding debt, the company will be presumed insolvent if it fails to comply with, or set asi...
The recent decision of Brereton J in In the matter of SurfStitch Group Limited [2018] NSWSC 164 reinforces the nature and fundamental importance of the exercise of making a “just estimate” of the value of creditors’ claims for voting purpose...
Author: Olga Voukidis Judgement Date: 16th July, 2015 Citation: Aldred v Stelcad Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 201 Jurisdiction: NSW Court of Appeal [1] In brief Liability for injuries sustained by an entrant onto demised premises will primarily rest with the...
Author: Olga Voukidis Judgement Date: 16th July, 2015 Citation: Aldred v Stelcad Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 201 Jurisdiction: NSW Court of Appeal [1] In brief Liability for injuries sustained by an entrant onto demised premises will primarily rest with the...
Beck v Henley & Anor [2014] NSWCA 201 Background Tami and Ami were residuary beneficiaries of a testamentary trust which owned 50% of the voting shares in a proprietary company. The trust was established to "sell call in collect ...