News & Blog

Legal perspectives from our expert lawyers

Filter Insights

Latest insights

Clear filters
Insolvency

“Going behind” a judgment debt in the bankruptcy context

The decision of the High Court of Australia in Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Ltd v Compton [2017] HCA 28; 261 CLR 132 (Ramsay) clarified the limits of a Bankruptcy Court's discretion to "go behind" a judgment, that is, to...

Published by Foez Dewan
9 September, 2019
Litigation and Dispute Resolution

The High Court rules in favour of the ATO, unlocking the gates to Paradise despite legal professional privilege claimed over corporate documents

In a recent big win for the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), the High Court decision in Glencore International AG v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] HCA 26 was handed down on 14 August 2019, upholding that legal professional...

Published by Andrew Lacey
3 September, 2019
Employment

The importance of getting it right: The difference between poor performance and employee misconduct

Managing employee performance is often challenging for employers and HR professionals, and there can be instances where an employee's performance can be so negligent that it can amount to misconduct.   In Steven Zirilli v StarTrack Express...

Published by McCabes News
27 August, 2019
Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Breaking news: Court orders first Strata Renewal Plan for the collective sale of a strata scheme

The Land and Environment Court has determined the first Strata Renewal Plan be given effect under the Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 (the Act).   In the case of Application by the Owners – Strata Plan No. 612...

Published by McCabes News
14 August, 2019
Employment

It’s the vibe of the thing: Newfound limits on Constitutional protection of political speech at work

In recent years, a growing body of case law has highlighted the circumstances in which an employee may be disciplined or dismissed for their posts on social media. In a landmark decision delivered last week in Comcare v Banerji [2019] HCA 23...

Published by McCabes News
11 August, 2019
Litigation and Dispute Resolution

You can’t have your contract and eat it: electing not to terminate

A party to a contract may be precluded from enforcing a contractual right if it has acted in a way that is clearly inconsistent with that right. This is known as the doctrine of election. Last Friday the New South Wales Court of Appeal applied the pr...

Published by Andrew Lacey
31 July, 2019
Insolvency

Another non-party director bites the dust

In December last year, we reported on a Federal Court judgment ordering costs against a non-party director for his unreasonable conduct to materially influence the conduct of a company involved in the winding up of the company. You can read the artic...

Published by Foez Dewan
30 July, 2019
Litigation and Dispute Resolution

The concept of reasonable time in contract law: the Court of Appeal resets the clock in Donau v ASC

It is trite to say that a contract sets out various rights and obligations that the parties to it have. Generally, contracts will specify when these rights have to be exercised or obligations have to be performed. But what if the contract is...

Published by Andrew Lacey
30 July, 2019
Employment

Workplace surveillance evidence and unfair dismissal: Can big brother be (illegally) watching?

As the sophistication and quality of surveillance technology continues to grow, there is increasing debate about the place of this technology in the workplace, and the appropriateness of using it to monitor employees.   While the Workplace...

Published by McCabes News
29 July, 2019
SIGN UP FOR INSIGHTS

Get the latest news direct to your inbox

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
*write "Private Individual" if not a company
Which areas of interest would you like to receive communications about via email from McCabes?
Please select as many options as needed.
If yes, please list these above
I consent to receiving marketing communications from McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd